democracy101.com

 contact@realdemocracy.com

Menu
  • External link opens in new tab or window
  • External link opens in new tab or window
  • External link opens in new tab or window

Amendments & Petitions

Amend the U.S. Constitution to Establish Direct Democracy

In the tradition of the simplicity of the U.S. Constitution, it would be simple to amend a constitution by just writing: "The government of the United States, and the several states, shall be a nonpartisan direct democracy through established voting networks connected to voters’ homes." Unfortunately, if left to the Congress, the Presidency and the Supreme Court, they would soon dilute it out of existence in the same ways they have perverted the U.S. Constitution.

 

Below is an example of a proposed amendment that will leave no doubt about the establishment of direct democracy or any wiggle room for the government to pervert. For the sake of discussion, the proposed amendment includes a complete revision and elevation of the public education system into DIRECT EDUCATION.

External link opens in new tab or windowRead More

Substantial Grounds Not Previously Presented

The petitioner respectfully submits, on substantial grounds not previously presented, that the Supreme Court should exercise the judicial courage to review the unconstitutional combination and monopoly effects of the two-party system of political party factions, to prohibit the two-party system's overt control of

External link opens in new tab or windowRead More

Column

Founder's Petition to the Supreme Court (to end the two-party system)

No. 99-9563

In the Supreme Court of the United States

In Re: Daniel B. Jeffs - Petitioner

vs.

The United States – Respondent

Petition for Writ of Prohibition

Questions Presented

External link opens in new tab or windowRead More

Column

New Supreme Court Petition

In the Supreme Court of the United States

In Re Daniel B. Jeffs - Petitioner

Vs.

The United States - Respondent

Petition For Writ Of Prohibition And Mandamus

In Re: Daniel B. Jeffs

Column

Petition for Rehearing of Order Denying Writ of Prohibition:

I received the following letter from the Supreme Court dated June 26, 2000

 

Re: In Re Daniel B. Jeffs

 

No. 99-9563

 

Dear Mr. Jeffs:

 

The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case: The petition for a writ of prohibition is denied.

 

Sincerely,

 

William K Suter, Clerk

 

On July 10, 2000, I submitted the following petition for rehearing of order denying my writ of prohibition:

 

No. 99-9563

In the Supreme Court of the United States

Daniel B. Jeffs - Petitioner

vs.

The United States - Respondent

Petition for Rehearing of Order Denying a Writ of Prohibition

In Re: Daniel B. Jeffs

Column

Proposed Ballot Initiative to Amend the California Constitution for Direct Democracy

It's time for a constitutional change in California

By Daniel B. Jeffs, Founder DDC

August 23, 2009

 

Over the past decade, the California energy crisis, the attack of September 11, 2001, and the ongoing economic crisis have impacted California more than enough for us to re-evaluate our state government and our constitution, both of which are in dire need of reform and repair.

 

We, the people of California, are receiving a painful education in pitfalls of democracy and inept government that is leading us on a road to self-destruction. Indeed, it's time for a change.

 

Following is a proposed California ballot initiative for direct democracy: (Note the existing (ignored) provisions in the California Constitution focused upon direct democracy.)

 

PROPOSED BALLOT INITIATIVE

 

AMENDMENT TO THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION

 

ARTICLE II

 

NONPARTISAN DIRECT REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY GOVERNMENT

 

SECTION 1. Article II of the California Constitution as previously written is hereby repealed and replaced. Sections unchanged are renumbered.

External link opens in new tab or windowRead More

Column

Questions Presented

  1. Does the two-party system adversely affect the rights, privileges, and immunities of citizens of the United States?

  2. Does the two-party system adversely affect the performance and accountability of the United States government?

  3. Is the two-party system unconstitutional?

  4. Should elections and the United States government be nonpartisan?

  5. Do current voting systems violate citizens' rights to vote equally, confidently, accurately and efficiently?

  6. Should voting systems be elevated and standardized throughout the United States?

In Re: Daniel B. Jeffs

Column

List of Parties

All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all parties to this petition is as follows:

  • The United States government, et al:

  • The United States House of Representatives

  • The United States Senate

  • The President of the United States

  • The United States Supreme Court

In Re: Daniel B. Jeffs

External link opens in new tab or windowRead More

Democracy 101

Daniel B. Jeffs, Founder

Column


White Horse Publishing 20258 Hwy. 18 Suite 430 - 405

Apple Valley, CA 92307

Column


contact@realdemocracy.com

close lightbox